Skip to main content
Connic
Back to BlogProduct Spotlight

AI Agent Routing: Trigger Agents and Return Results

AI agent routing moves events into an agent and returns results to the right system through Connic sync routes and asynchronous outbound connectors.

August 24, 20269 min readAuthor: Connic Engineering

AI agent routing is the integration layer that moves an external event into an agent and delivers the result to the system that needs it. Connic handles that round trip with inbound connectors, synchronous routes, and outbound connectors, so the agent can sit between the systems your business already runs.

What is AI agent routing?

AI agent routing connects an event source, an agent run, and a result destination. It answers practical questions: Which event starts the agent? Does the caller wait? Where does the finished result go? Which component owns credentials, payload formatting, and retries?

This article uses routing to mean traffic across system boundaries. Choosing a model, delegating a task to another agent, or building a fixed multi-agent sequence belongs to agent orchestration. Review how Connic agents call other agents when that is the routing problem you need to solve.

The four stages of routing an external event through an AI agent and back to another system
StageRouting questionConnic path
Event arrivesWhich external system starts the work?Inbound or sync connector
Agent startsWhich linked agent or agents receive the event?Connector Flow links
Run completesDoes the caller wait for the answer?Sync response or asynchronous run
Result leavesWhich system receives the output, and when?Automatic, agent-tool, or middleware outbound connector

Why triggering an AI agent is only half the integration

A webhook handler or queue consumer can start an agent. The work is still incomplete if the fraud score never reaches the alert topic, the classified ticket never returns to the support system, or the drafted reply never reaches the customer. Every asynchronous run needs a result destination.

An inbound acknowledgement is different from a result. Webhook and inbound MCP requests return after dispatch with identifiers for the created runs. That keeps the source request short, but the caller does not receive the completed output in that response. Use a sync connector when the caller should wait, or attach an outbound connector that delivers the result later.

Trigger selection has its own delivery and replay tradeoffs. Compare webhook, Kafka, SQS, and Postgres trigger patterns before choosing the ingress side of the route.

How Connic routes inputs and results

Connector direction defines what happens at the system boundary. One configured connector instance has one direction, so a Kafka round trip uses an inbound consumer and an outbound producer. The input and output transports can also differ: a Stripe event can start a run whose result goes to SQS or an HTTP callback.

Inbound
Starts linked agents without waiting for output. Event connectors fan out to their linked agents; an MCP tool call selects the linked agent exposed as that tool.
Sync
Keeps the request or session open until the agent finishes, then returns the result on that route. The documented default timeout is five minutes.
Outbound
Sends data from a linked agent to another system. The connector owns the destination, credentials, payload validation, transport formatting, and retries.

A sync webhook fits an interactive product feature that needs the answer immediately. An inbound webhook plus an outbound callback fits longer work. Kafka, SQS, email, and Telegram use separate inbound and outbound connector instances. Review every connector direction and setup path.

How do Connic outbound connector modes differ?

Direction tells Connic that a connector sends data out. Its link mode decides who controls each send. This choice belongs to the link between an outbound connector and an agent, so the same connector type can support different routing policies in different flows.

Comparison of automatic, agent-tool, and middleware outbound connector modes in Connic
Outbound modeWho decidesWhen it sendsBest fit
AutomaticConnector Flow policyAfter each eligible run completesResult delivery for all runs or selected inputs
Agent-toolThe LLM agentWhen the model calls the connector toolContent-dependent routing that needs model judgment
MiddlewareYour Python codeWhen middleware calls the connectorDeterministic business rules outside the model

Automatic outbound connectors

Use automatic mode when each eligible completed run should queue a delivery. It can cover all runs, including manual, scheduled, and agent-triggered runs, or only runs started by selected inbound or sync connectors. Failed and cancelled runs are skipped.

The outgoing format depends on the transport. Webhook, Kafka, and SQS automatic connectors deliver a completed-run envelope. Email and Telegram connectors interpret the final output as a message for that channel. The connector holds those transport-specific rules. The agent prompt can stay focused on the job.

Agent-tool outbound connectors

Agent-tool mode adds a named connector tool to an LLM agent. The model chooses whether to call it, when to call it, and which valid payload to supply. Use it when the decision depends on meaning inside the conversation or event, such as escalating only the cases the agent classifies as urgent.

The connector validates the tool payload and keeps its stored URL, credentials, and routing defaults unavailable to the model. The agent receives a purpose-specific action. Connic builds the transport request and handles the secrets.

Middleware outbound connectors

Middleware mode keeps the routing decision in Python. Code can call the connector before or after agent execution with send_connector(action_name, payload). The model cannot access a middleware outbound connector. Use middleware for fixed policy checks, deterministic fan-out, or explicit per-run duplicate suppression with an idempotency key.

middleware/support-agent.py
from connic.tools import send_connector

async def after(response: str, context: dict) -> str:
    if context["payload"].get("priority") == "urgent":
        await send_connector(
            "send_to_results_webhook",
            {
                "payload": {
                    "run_id": context["run_id"],
                    "result": response,
                }
            },
            idempotency_key=context["run_id"],
        )

    return response

This example routes urgent results to a configured HTTP webhook and uses the run ID as the idempotency key. Connic resolves the connector and queues the delivery. Follow the middleware outbound connector guide for the runtime contract.

Which result path fits each AI agent workflow?

A browser waiting on an HTTP response and a Kafka consumer expect different result paths. Connic keeps the agent logic unchanged while the connector layer handles each transport.

Common Connic routing patterns for triggers and AI agent results
WorkflowInput routeResult route
Interactive HTTP requestWebhook in sync modeSame HTTP response
Long-running HTTP jobInbound webhookOutbound webhook callback
Event or queue pipelineKafka or SQS inbound connectorSeparate Kafka or SQS outbound connector
Inbox or chat workflowEmail or Telegram inbound connectorSeparate channel outbound connector
MCP clientMCP in sync or inbound modeTool result or immediate run ID
Private destinationAny supported sourceBridge-routed outbound HTTP, Kafka, SQS, or email

One agent can have several outbound links, and automatic links can fan a completed result out to several destinations. Automatic source filters keep each route narrow. One outbound callback can accept only runs from the production webhook while an all-runs link also covers manual, scheduled, and agent-triggered work.

Browse the current Connic connector catalog to check supported directions and configuration for each transport.

What Connic removes from your routing code

Without a connector layer, your application owns the endpoints and consumers that accept work, plus the callback workers that return it. It also stores destination credentials, validates payloads, tracks retry state, and writes delivery logs. Connic keeps that work with the environment-scoped connector. Your agent remains YAML, Python, and Git; Connector Flow controls how external systems reach it and where its output goes.

Private infrastructure does not require a public inbound port. Bridge runs inside your network and establishes an outbound-only tunnel that supported connectors can use for bidirectional traffic. See how Connic Bridge reaches private systems.

Route the full agent round trip with Connic

Connect the systems that start your agents, choose how results leave, and keep credentials, payload validation, and delivery inside managed connectors.

Start routing agents free

Frequently Asked Questions

AI agent routing is the integration layer that carries an external event into an agent and sends the result to the system that needs it. It covers the input transport, which agents receive the event, whether the caller waits, and how completed output is delivered.

A webhook or inbound MCP call returns an identifier for each created run, then a separate outbound connector can deliver the completed result to a webhook, Kafka topic, SQS queue, email recipient, or Telegram chat. In Connic, an automatic outbound link can send every completed run or only runs from selected input connectors.

Use a sync connector when the caller can keep the request or session open and needs the result immediately. Use an inbound connector plus an outbound connector for longer work, event pipelines, or systems that expect a callback or message later. Connic documents a five-minute default timeout for sync routes.

Connic supports automatic, agent-tool, and middleware outbound links. Automatic sends after eligible completed runs. Agent-tool lets the LLM decide whether and when to call the connector. Middleware lets Python code call the connector while keeping the action unavailable to the model.

No. The outbound connector keeps its destination, credentials, formatting, and retry handling server-side. The model supplies only connector-defined payload fields. Middleware supplies a configured action name, that payload, and an optional idempotency key. Connic validates the payload before queuing delivery.

More from the Blog

Product Spotlight

Staging to Production: How Connic Environments Isolate AI Agents

Connic environments map git branches to isolated deployments, each with its own secrets, connectors, budgets, and run history, so one agent spec ships safely.

August 6, 20268 min read
Product Spotlight

LLM Context Compression for Long-Running AI Agents

Connic compresses older conversation history and oversized tool results, then retries the model call, so long-running agent sessions survive context limits.

July 20, 20268 min read
Product Spotlight

Connic Tests: Catch Agent Regressions Before They Reach Production

A YAML-driven testing framework built for non-deterministic AI agents. Repeated-run pass thresholds, expression-based assertions, custom-code mocking, multimodal fixtures, and a deploy gate that blocks failed checks by default.

May 6, 20268 min read
Product Spotlight

Human-in-the-Loop AI Agents: How Approvals Work in Production

How to pause an AI agent before refunds, deletes, or external calls, route the decision to a human, and resume automatically, with a full audit trail.

April 5, 202610 min read
Product Spotlight

A/B Testing for AI Agents: Ship Better Prompts with Confidence

You changed the prompt and it feels better. Run a controlled experiment to find out whether it is, and let real traffic decide.

March 27, 20269 min read
Product Spotlight

Secure AI Agents: A Production Safety Checklist

Shipping AI agents without a security strategy is a liability. A practical checklist covering prompt injection, PII handling, output validation, and the guardrails you need before go-live.

March 21, 202612 min read
Product Spotlight

Agent Guardrails: Real-Time Safety for Your AI Agents

Connic Guardrails intercept agent inputs and outputs in real time to block prompt injection, redact PII, and enforce topic restrictions.

March 3, 20269 min read
Product Spotlight

Agent Observability: Track Costs, Tokens & Runs

Deploying AI agents without visibility is flying blind. Build custom dashboards, track LLM costs per model, and catch failures before users do.

January 23, 20268 min read
Product Spotlight

Composer SDK: Better Agent Development Tooling

Stop manual uploads and YAML guessing. The Composer SDK adds scaffolding, validation, cloud-backed hot-reload development, and CLI deployments.

December 27, 20255 min read