Skip to main content
Connic
Back to BlogIndustry Insights

Webhook vs Kafka vs SQS vs Postgres for AI Agent Triggers

Compare webhook, Kafka, SQS, and Postgres LISTEN/NOTIFY as AI agent triggers by delivery guarantees, ordering, replay, latency, and failure behavior.

June 29, 2026(last updated: August 17, 2026)9 min readAuthor: Connic Engineering

Webhook, Apache Kafka, AWS SQS, and Postgres LISTEN/NOTIFY solve one production question: how does an external event start an AI agent run? The choice depends on delivery, ordering, replay, backpressure, and response latency. This comparison stays at that inbound trigger boundary; outbound result delivery and MCP tool calls are separate decisions.

Four inbound paths to the same agent run

All four are inbound connectors: an external event arrives, Connic parses it, and one run starts for every linked agent with the payload attached. The connector layer handles receiving the event, authenticating the source, and retrying or buffering where the protocol supports it. The agent can stay unchanged while the event path changes underneath it. See how inbound, outbound, and sync modes differ.

Webhook: synchronous HTTP push

A webhook connector gives your agent a URL. Any service that can make an HTTP request triggers one run for every linked agent by posting to it, authenticated with a shared secret in the X-Connic-Secret header. It is the direct HTTP option and the only one that can hand the result straight back: in sync mode the request blocks until the run finishes and returns its output, which is what a chat UI or a synchronous API call needs.

terminal
curl -X POST "<webhook-url>" \
  -H "X-Connic-Secret: <your-secret-key>" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"order_id": "12345", "action": "review"}'

Until Connic accepts the request, delivery belongs to the caller: retry transport failures and unsuccessful responses. In inbound mode, a successful response includes run IDs that Connic has created. Monitor those run IDs for dispatch or execution failure; the HTTP response does not prove that queue publication succeeded. The source still has no durable event log or ordering between concurrent calls. A caller that retries should send a stable event ID or idempotency key. The receiving agent or tool must persist processed IDs and check them before repeating a side effect; the webhook connector does not deduplicate arbitrary payloads. Follow the webhook sync setup for sync mode and review outbound signature verification.

Apache Kafka: streaming consumer

A Kafka connector subscribes to a topic as a consumer and starts one run for every linked agent on each message. The full Kafka context (topic, partition, offset, key) arrives under a _kafka field. Because Kafka is a durable, ordered log, this pattern preserves order within a partition and can replay retained history with a new consumer group configured to start at the earliest offset. Connic commits the offset after it creates a run for every linked agent. A restart before that commit can redeliver the message and duplicate a run already created; after the commit, a created run that fails before or during execution does not make Kafka redeliver the message.

message-payload.json
{
  "order_id": "12345",
  "customer": "john@example.com",
  "items": ["widget-a", "widget-b"],
  "_kafka": {
    "topic": "orders",
    "partition": 0,
    "offset": 1542,
    "key": "order-12345"
  }
}

Consumers that share a group ID split partitions between them. Separate group IDs consume the same retained stream independently. Inside Connic, one connector fans each message out to every agent linked to that connector. Reach for Kafka when you already run it, when throughput is high, or when ordering and replay matter. The cost is operational: you need a cluster, and the connector is a consumer in it. Review the Kafka connector settings.

Postgres LISTEN/NOTIFY: in-database push

If the event you care about is a change in your database, you may not need a queue at all. The Postgres connector opens a persistent connection and listens on a channel; a trigger calls pg_notify when rows change, and each notification starts one run for every linked agent. There is no polling and no extra infrastructure: the database you already have becomes the event source.

trigger.sql
-- Notify the agent whenever a customer row is inserted
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION notify_new_customer()
RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
BEGIN
  PERFORM pg_notify(
    'new_customers',
    json_build_object('customer_id', NEW.id)::text
  );
  RETURN NEW;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;

CREATE TRIGGER customer_insert_trigger
  AFTER INSERT ON customers
  FOR EACH ROW
  EXECUTE FUNCTION notify_new_customer();

NOTIFY keeps no replay log for a disconnected listener. A notification sent while the connector is disconnected is missed, and reconnecting does not recover it. PostgreSQL's documentation, checked in 2026, sets the default payload limit below 8000 bytes, so send an ID and let the agent fetch the full row. Check PostgreSQL's NOTIFY delivery and payload limits. Use LISTEN/NOTIFY for near-real-time reactions to data changes where an occasional miss during a reconnect is acceptable, and use Kafka or SQS when every change must be processed. If the database sits in a private network, route it through Bridge instead of exposing it. See how to reach private infrastructure through Bridge. Follow the Postgres LISTEN/NOTIFY setup.

AWS SQS: durable polled queue

An SQS connector polls a queue with long polling and starts one run for every linked agent per message. Messages persist until every linked run completes and the connector deletes them, so worker restarts and traffic spikes do not discard queued work. If a run fails, the message reappears after its visibility timeout and is retried; messages that fail repeatedly can be routed to a dead-letter queue you configure in AWS. Standard queues do not guarantee order, while FIFO queues preserve it within a message group.

This is the pattern for reliable asynchronous work that must survive failure without you building the retry machinery yourself. AWS documentation checked in 2026 allows a long poll to wait up to 20 seconds when the queue is empty; the request returns sooner when a message arrives. Review the AWS SQS long-poll limits. You also need an AWS account and credentials. Review the SQS queue and polling settings.

Side by side

Delivery, ordering, replay, backpressure, and latency distinguish these triggers:

Delivery, ordering, replay, backpressure, latency, and infrastructure differences between four agent triggers
DimensionWebhookKafkaPostgresSQS
Trigger styleSynchronous HTTP pushStreaming consumerIn-database push (NOTIFY)Polled queue
Delivery guaranteeCaller-controlledRun creation before offset commitAt-most-onceAt-least-once
OrderingNonePer partitionCommit order while connectedNone (FIFO: per group)
Buffering / replayNoneDurable log, replayableNo replay after disconnectDurable queue, no replay
BackpressureCaller rate limits/timeouts; accepted runs wait in ConnicConsumer lagServer notification queue can fill; no consumer replayQueue absorbs spikes
Typical latencyDirect request (can return result)Near-real-timeNear-real-timeLong poll (returns on message)
Extra infrastructureNoneKafka clusterReuse your databaseAWS account + queue

Choosing a pattern

Reach for a webhook
Another service can call your agent over HTTP and may need the result in the same request. The caller retries transport failures; a successful inbound response returns run IDs to monitor.
Reach for Kafka
You already run Kafka, throughput is high, or you need ordering within a partition and the ability to replay retained history with a new consumer group. Your agent tolerates duplicate runs if the connector restarts before committing an offset.
Reach for Postgres LISTEN/NOTIFY
The event is a row change, you want to reuse Postgres, and an occasional miss during a disconnect is acceptable. Send IDs, not whole rows.
Reach for SQS
Work is asynchronous and must survive failure. SQS buffers the message, retries it after the visibility timeout, and can route repeated failures to a dead-letter queue configured in AWS.
Configure the trigger you chose

Set up a webhook endpoint, Kafka consumer, SQS queue, or Postgres listener and link it to an agent.

Open the connector setup guides

Frequently Asked Questions

Use the Postgres LISTEN/NOTIFY connector. Add a trigger that calls pg_notify on the channel the connector listens to. Each notification starts one run for every linked agent with the payload attached. Notifications sent while the connector is disconnected are missed and cannot be replayed, so use Kafka or SQS when every change must be processed.

Kafka preserves order within a partition and lets a new consumer group replay retained history. Consumers with the same group ID split partitions; separate group IDs consume independently. Connic creates a run for every linked agent before committing the offset, so a restart before commit can create duplicates.

A webhook is an HTTP push that can return run results in sync mode. In inbound mode, a successful response returns a created run ID for every linked agent; monitor those runs because the response does not prove queue publication. The webhook source keeps no event log. SQS holds the source message until linked runs succeed, then redelivers it after the visibility timeout when processing fails.

With Kafka, yes: use a new consumer group configured to start at the earliest offset to reprocess the retained log. SQS retries a failed message until it succeeds or moves to a dead-letter queue, but deleted messages are gone. Webhooks have no built-in replay, and caller retries can create duplicate runs. Postgres notifications sent during a disconnect are missed.

No. Kafka dispatch and SQS processing can repeat. Deduplicate Kafka with a stable application event ID or the topic, partition, and offset tuple; deduplicate SQS with a stable application event ID or SQS message ID. Webhook callers should send a stable event ID, and the receiving agent or tool must make side effects idempotent. Postgres notifications sent during a connector disconnect are missed.

More from the Blog

Industry Insights

EU-Hosted AI Models in 2026: Providers, Dependence & Options

Compare EU-hosted AI models by location, retention, operator, portability, legal exposure, and deployment model, using a 2026 Commission-requested study.

August 18, 202611 min read
Industry Insights

EU AI Act Article 50: What Your AI Agent Must Disclose

The Commission adopted its final Article 50 guidelines on 20 July 2026, thirteen days before the rules apply. Here is what agent teams have to disclose, and when.

July 26, 202610 min read
Industry Insights

The OpenAI Hugging Face Hack: Guardrail Lessons for AI Agents

OpenAI models escaped a test sandbox and breached Hugging Face in July 2026. What the incident reveals about guardrails and how to secure production AI agents.

July 24, 20269 min read
Industry Insights

Soofi S Preview: Access, Benchmarks & AI Agent Fit

Soofi S is a gated preview of Germany's 31.6B open-model project. Its benchmarks, release status, limits, and potential for self-hosted AI agents.

July 15, 20269 min read
Industry Insights

What Is an MCP Connector? A Practical Definition

An MCP connector links an AI app to external tools and data over the Model Context Protocol. Learn how it works and when it beats a custom API integration.

July 8, 20268 min read
Industry Insights

Pre-built AI Agent Connectors: Platforms, Types & Checklist (2026)

Compare pre-built AI agent connector platforms, connector types, supported modes, and the delivery guarantees to verify before choosing one.

June 16, 20269 min read
Industry Insights

The Real Cost of Assembling Your Own AI Agent Stack

The real cost of assembling your own AI agent stack comes from the integration and maintenance tax between tools. Learn when buying a platform wins.

June 9, 202610 min read
Industry Insights

How to Run AI Agents in the EU Without US Hyperscalers

Run production AI agents in the EU without US hyperscalers: what EU-hosted must really mean, where the US CLOUD Act exposes you, and a sovereignty checklist.

June 4, 20269 min read
Industry Insights

AI Agent Deployment Platforms: 16 Vendors Compared (2026)

Compare 16 AI agent deployment platforms by runtime boundary, language, hosting model, connector ownership, residency, and pricing.

April 19, 202615 min read